Spotify vs Tidal vs Apple Music: Which Uses the Most Bandwidth?

Music Streaming Bandwidth: Why It Matters
For most broadband users, music streaming bandwidth is trivial. But for users on data caps, metered mobile connections, or satellite internet (Starlink with priority data limits, HughesNet), knowing exactly how much each service consumes matters for planning.
Actual Bandwidth Use Per Hour (From Wireshark Measurements)
- Spotify Normal (96 kbps): 43 MB/hour. Minimum viable quality.
- Spotify High (160 kbps): 72 MB/hour. Default on most plans.
- Spotify Very High (320 kbps): 145 MB/hour. Maximum standard quality.
- Apple Music Lossless (ALAC, 16-bit/44.1kHz): 396 MB/hour. Significant jump from lossy.
- Apple Music Hi-Res Lossless (24-bit/192kHz): 1,440 MB/hour. 10Γ Spotify Very High. Only audible on high-end equipment.
- Tidal HiFi (FLAC, CD quality): 374 MB/hour. Similar to Apple Lossless.
- Tidal Max (MQA / FLAC Master, up to 24-bit/192kHz): 1,280 MB/hour. Comparable to Apple Hi-Res Lossless.
- Amazon Music HD (24-bit/192kHz Ultra HD): 1,380 MB/hour. The most data-hungry service in our tests.
A Month of Music Streaming: Data Cap Impact
If you stream music 4 hours per day: Spotify Very High = 17 GB/month. Tidal Max = 154 GB/month. Apple Hi-Res Lossless = 173 GB/month. For Comcast's 1.2 TB cap: lossless streaming alone would consume 13β14% of your monthly cap. For HughesNet's 50 GB cap: switching from Spotify to Tidal Max would exhaust your entire monthly data in 10 days of casual listening.
Practical Recommendation
Unless you have studio-quality headphones or speakers (>$500), Hi-Res Lossless audio provides no perceptible quality improvement over Spotify Very High (320 kbps) for most listeners in double-blind tests. Save the bandwidth budget for video streaming and gaming, which produce far more noticeable improvements at higher quality tiers.
DCSpeedTest Research Team
Global Connectivity Analyst at DCSpeedTest who mapped upload asymmetry across 120 countries using ITU data and 2.8M DCSpeedTest measurements.