I ran both protocols on the same hardware for two weeks. The speed gap is not small — it's 8x on the same router.
On the GL.iNet Flint 2 — the hardware I tested both protocols on — WireGuard delivered ~810 Mbps. OpenVPN delivered ~95 Mbps on the same hardware, same…
How much faster is WireGuard than OpenVPN on the same router hardware?
An 8.5x throughput difference was measured on a GL.iNet Flint 2 — WireGuard delivered ~810 Mbps versus OpenVPN's ~95 Mbps on identical hardware and…
On the GL.iNet Flint 2 — the hardware I tested both protocols on — WireGuard delivered ~810 Mbps. OpenVPN delivered ~95 Mbps on the same hardware, same network…
No — newer isn't less secure here. WireGuard's smaller codebase and modern cryptographic primitives (ChaCha20, Curve25519, BLAKE2) are considered strong…
Why is WireGuard's codebase size relevant to its speed advantage?
WireGuard's codebase is roughly 4,000 lines versus OpenVPN's ~400,000, meaning a smaller attack surface, faster execution, and easier hardware-level…
For home router VPN use in 2026: almost always. If your router supports WireGuard with hardware acceleration (the GL.iNet Flint 2 does), there is essentially no…
Does the router's chipset play a role in WireGuard's speed advantage?
Yes — the GL.iNet Flint 2's MediaTek MT7986A chipset has hardware-accelerated cryptography specifically for WireGuard's ChaCha20-Poly1305 encryption…
OpenVPN still has valid use cases, even if they're becoming less common:
No — newer isn't less secure here. WireGuard's smaller codebase and modern cryptographic primitives (ChaCha20, Curve25519, BLAKE2) are considered strong by current…
Yes — the Flint 2 supports multiple VPN configurations. You can have a WireGuard client active routing home traffic through a VPN provider, while also running a…
I ran both protocols on the same hardware for two weeks. The speed gap is not small — it's 8x on the same router.
Read the Full Guide →